I started this experiment with Impossible Charlie in 2008 I think it was. I formatted it myself (however crudely that might be said by some of the small actual self-publishers) with the help of my pal. This was so painful and so difficult, I was glad to be done with it and vowed never to do it again.
I did research all the major printers and went with Lightning Source. It's a real printer, they do about 44 million books a year. I think CreateSpace uses them. If the address is in TN, probably yes. They don't hold your hand, they don't help except if the thing is too wrong to print. I don't suggest anyone do this because, boy, I don't want to do it again.
But every month for the last 3 months, I get a notification from Lightning Source that they'd printed and shipped copies. Not before Nov. tho. Nothing. I sold a few (under 5) in the intervening years but once Summer Horse started selling and dragged Charlie/Dream Horse with it, people are choosing paper books.
I still think it's too much work but if you want to, it's probably worth the experience.
I think this has something to do with writing but it has more to do with life.
People like drugs. They like alcohol. They like anything that stimulates them and there's nothing that stimulates like a burst of adrenaline that you get when you're in a big freaking crisis. So for a lot of people--and too many of them are journalists, nattering nabobs of negativity and stupid (and I mean stupid like the pol who was worried about Guam tipping over if too many people stood on the shore) politicians
--the stage isn't their stage if they're not braying about doom. We are force-fed a diet of crisis. Nothing is ever good, nothing is ever right either in the world at large or our world at small.
I'm not going to change your mind if you're addicted to emergency living. However, I will try to help. If you look for the good, however small it may seem to be, *your* outlook will improve. Is there anything more important about how comfortable you are in your life? Don't you want inner peace? Do you really want to be upset all the time? This is getting in the way of solving our problems.
On that note, I have plenty of problems to solve today before the huge snowstorm tomoro or whenever.
This is an interesting (and intelligent) man who isn't doing commercial fiction. I like that he's tackling something serious that there doesn't seem to be much of a market for yet. Anyone who is willing to get on board now, has my admiration. Our day will come, too.
Who are you?
Bakari Akil II
What do you do for a living?
I am a professor and I teach communication courses.
What would you like to do for a living?
I enjoy being a professor but if I had my way I would write professionally for a living.
What’s your educational background?
I have a Bachelor’s in Law and Society, a Masters in Social Science and I earned my Ph.D. in Mass Communications from Florida State University. Go Noles!
How did you become interested in writing?
I have always been attracted to writing. Even as a child I would always be putting together little booklets and trying to tell stories. In high school I wanted to be a comedy writer so I would often write funny little stories and force them on my friends. I’d also leave them in random places around school and then sit back and watch people’s reaction to the material I wrote. How did that work out? Not too well! All I write now is non-fiction.
You also write for Psychology Today. How did you become interested in that type of writing?
Once my desire to be a comedy writer died down I still continued writing. I never viewed myself as a writer and I still don’t but I was always typing something up or writing something down. Even when I didn’t have an audience I always had a need to put my thoughts in a coherent form. Whatever I was involved in I wrote about. I still have notebooks filled with writings about topics I was interested in my twenties with subjects like Spanish, history, comedy, philosophy (mine of course), city planning and the list goes on.
As an undergraduate I became very impressed with scholars and their contribution to the public’s understanding of complex topics. When I became a graduate student I became interested in academic theories and its ability to explain human behavior. That is when I decided to become a public scholar. I wanted to be the link between academic scholarship and the public.
At first I didn’t know how to do that and so I turned to journalism. When I learned something or experienced it I had an immediate need to share and journalism offered me that opportunity. But then in the early 2000s I started to read books like Idea Virus, The Tipping Point, Everything Bad is Good for You and a lot of books that were about looking at issues in a counterintuitive way based on academic research. I realized that I had found my niche.
Why did you feel qualified to write this type of material?
First, academic ideas had already started to creep into my writing because I was one. Most of the authors writing these types of books were not academics, per se, but they were willing to do the legwork to gather the material and then translate it for a public audience. For me it wasn’t legwork it was a huge part of my professional and personal life. What made the leap easy is that I also wrote non-stop for public audiences.
By the time I started writing my blog, Communication Central, for Psychology Today I had been writing that type of material for about eight years.
You also have a number of books strictly available for e-readers. Why did you decide to go the e-publishing route?
My first and only book deal (in 2008) was a terrible one. I was more anxious to have my book published as an academic as opposed to being concerned with what I would get out of the deal so I did a lot of things that violated Rule 101 for authors. I signed a lousy deal and put not just the ball, but also all of my equipment, in their court. I signed away the rights to use that information how I see fit, didn’t ask for an advance and I have never seen a penny for my efforts. They also priced the book as high as a college textbook ($100) so it is not and will never be a practical purchase for anyone.
I vowed not to do something like that again. As the publisher sought me out I still had no plans of writing a book for public consumption. But my writings on different subjects were getting longer and longer. Finally in 2009 I had about two or three manuscripts around the house and I was considering just blogging the information. I was already a professor and had a comfortable lifestyle so I didn’t feel like going through the trouble I’d heard so many authors talk about in trying to score a book deal.
But as I looked at the amount of information I compiled something bothered me about doing that. My wife and some other people thought I would be crazy to just release it on the Internet and argued against it. At the same time I had begun to bump into some of Joe Konrath’s work (just like everyone else it seems). That’s when Amazon became an option for me.
How many books do you have out and what is your latest?
I have eleven books published through Amazon, Barnes & Noble (Pubit) and Lulu and my latest is Psychology from all Angles. What is Psychology from all Angles about?
I use a lot of communication and psychological theories to explain why humans behave as they do when I lecture. To keep it interesting I use a lot of entertaining and humorous real world examples to keep the attention of my students. I decided to use this approach when putting this book together.
In it I discuss how we often overestimate what we have to do to succeed instead of trying to find out the specific tasks we need to achieve the outcomes we desire. I also cover obscure academic theories as well as a lot of media theories that affect how we process information and in turn influences the decisions we make.
Do you have any other interests besides writing?
Besides spending time with my family, I am very involved in Brazilian Jiu-jitsu (since 2004), which is a form of wrestling with submissions. I also have a Judo background.
Do you compete?
No I just love the sporting aspect of it. I have played a lot of sports in my life and I believe it’s one of the highest ways one can express intelligence through one’s body. That’s why I train in it.
Any last words?
I would like to thank Barbara for providing me the opportunity to introduce myself and my new book to her readers.
Sheila asked me to be specific. I won't go back and get the exact numbers but this will be close.
By the end of Dec. 2010 I had sold exactly 850 books at BN. By a week or so later it jumped to about 1119. They lag in reporting.
In Dec. I sold like 65 books at Amazon. Yeah I know that's a crazy difference. But I was excited because I had gotten --by 1/1/11-- to 900 which was a great achievement considering my sales are predominantly in middle reader books.
As of today at BN I've sold about 850 copies (of all my books). At Amazon it's over 100 with Dream Horse leading the way.
The audiences are really really different at the 2 sites. I do nothing to market the books. I'm not aware of any way to market middle reader ebooks, or get reviews for them. I have the blog and I don't think kids come here (I hope not!) I hope that answers the question. I'm having a You've Got Mail "My head's all woozy, what did you say again and I love plastic daisies they're so cheerful" afternoon.
I thought last month was an anomaly because of the holidays but I'm very much at the same sales point at BN as I was last month at this time. I'm way over any previous month at Amazon.
A few years ago I used to hang around Absolute Write. It's a nice community of (mostly jolly) writers. Maybe newbie writers don't understand how they will be abused by this system. Some people maybe even enjoy it--some people are that strange. You can learn how certain agents behave so that's always good but what's the point of an agent anymore? These people used to be facilitators now they're roadblocks. They don't even keep their irritation to themselves anymore. They have blogs and spew their meanness to writers in general. Why? Doesn't this seem self-defeating to anyone but me?
If you think there is an unlimited pool of good writers who will eventually show up at your inbox offering you the pleasure of making money off of them, I guess it seems reasonable you can treat many of them like debris (you know the word I wanted to use). That pool is not unlimited. At some point either every good writer (shrug/eyeroll) will have an agent and it's not you, or the rest of the good writers will have had enough abuse and go digital.
Back in Nov. I sent an editor at NAL a proposal for a book series. Just to remind everyone, that would not be my first series either in books or in television. I have demonstrated to 4 million people a day that I can write a continuing story. (Yes, that was my audience at NBC) She has not yet gotten back to me. What's the problem? It was about 4 pages long. I bet I never hear from her. And she thought I was a good writer.
You'll be treated to a guest post today or tomoro, sorry I'm under the weather and not able to accomplish much.
I didn't know we still had morals in this country. (Not joking) Between the pornography and "alternate" lifestyles and the politicians like Barney Frank stealing from us left and right, Chris Dodd like a pig at the trough and making "waitress sandwiches" with Teddy "The Swimmer" Kennedy who left Mary Jo Kopechne to drown and was lauded as a great man, there is nothing high minded about those elitists telling us what's good for us but not them.
I have been good about keeping these thoughts to myself all these months. But after this weekend maybe I'm just too exhausted with it all.
So here's a post from Ursula K Guin's blog (or Richard Curtis--I don't know I'm frankly lucky to be able to stand up without keeling over so I'm not going to figure out here's X from Y thru G thing right now)
And let me add one thing--I watch Fox News. So all the braying and guffawing about Rupert Murdoch in the comments section is just the same as HuffPo except better grammar & spelling.
New language in the termination provision of the Harper’s boilerplate gives them the right to cancel a contract if “Author’s conduct evidences a lack of due regard for public conventions and morals, or if Author commits a crime or any other act that will tend to bring Author into serious contempt, and such behavior would materially damage the Work’s reputation or sales.” The consequences? Harper can terminate your book deal. Not only that, you’ll have to repay your advance. Harper may also avail itself of “other legal remedies” against you.
I admit I don't have an answer for that question. A year ago I would have said that's where the money is. But if you can't get to the money, then it has no value.
I understand very well that unpublished authors would like to be verified in some way. If you are published traditionally that says you're good enough. If you're not published you're obviously not good enough. Then how do you explain me and so many published, professional writers who can't get editors and agents to reply to query letters? Are we to believe our work is substandard? It will be difficult to convince me of that. We're not current enough? May I remind you that my bestselling book is 30 years old. You could argue that our work is not "marketable".
I don't want to play these games anymore with them when there's a legit game in town called digital. I'm tired of jumping through the hoops, I'm tired of being abused and mistreated. Maybe I recognize these situations when they're happening better than someone who hasn't been published and is so eager to be accepted. I can't understand waiting for a year for an editor to reply on a pitch for a 2nd book for them. Two words. Professional Courtesy. It doesn't exist anymore. Okay. Fine with me.
I don't even want to think about my knitting book with Alpha/Penguin, it was such a disaster. But let me say this--my advance was for $18,000. The company couldn't even bestir itself to get it into the chain stores. I still "owe" them $16,000. You cannot do enough marketing on your own to counteract what the publisher won't do. Because of the first editor on the project, the book was 18 months late and missed the peak selling interest in beginner knitting books. There's no amount of websitery or blogging you can do to counteract that reality. My interest in making them money by additional blood, sweat and tears waned rapidly as this project progressed.
$16,000 is a lot of money to earn to pay them back (at pennies on the dollar) for their mistakes. I had to pay for all the supplies, a good camera and 2 different illustrators. I had to pay the agent. I wound up with nothing. Am I suppose to invest my own money to make them money now? Am I supposed to take out a loan to pay them back so we're even? (No, they're not asking for the money back, that's not how it works.) Should I set up my own book tour? Hire a publicity agent? The answer is no. This book was 2 years of upset and it's an embarrassment. This is how you get authors fleeing from traditional publishing.
I've talked about dear urrggg before who decided to vent on my book's Nook page because she doesn't know how to use her Nook. And then she was joined by someone even less capable of connecting to the internet and downloading a book successfully. Who was then joined by someone who was able to download the book but it took an hour but she did give the book a 5 star review and thank you, whoever you are. And most definitely yes, I did alert B&N to this issue, they checked and there is no reason on their end or my end why these customers experienced difficulties.
Here's the reality. No author can control the website customers are downloading from, nor can they magically control the download speed at their house.
Yesterday we had a winner over at Amazon. Someone who was raised by wolves, because humans couldn't possibly do that bad a job at it, decided that there were 10 misspelled words per page and made a huge deal over it. Considering that at least 1 time a month someone gets a refund from Amazon for 1 of my books (mostly I think it's because they hit the buy button instead of the sample) if losing 99 cents is so painful, just ask for a refund. But no. A malicious review needs to be posted for the world to see.
After discussing this with my pal, I decided to leave the review there and not ask Amazon to remove it. This performance of bad temperament deserves to be seen by the entire planet. It can stay there forever.
Of course my first reaction was wow, the formatting on this thing must have gone haywire during the conversion. I'm in the process of going back to all the books, converting them into html for Amazon, making sure they are as perfect as I know how to do and then uploading them again. It's a time consuming process and not at the top of my list of all I must get accomplished each day.
Imagine my surprise when this book, even in docx, converted perfectly to html, the indents were there and guess what--no misspellings. So a word to the wise--lay off the drugs. Your eyes will stop spinning in your head like pinwheels and you'll be able to read simple sentences without thinking "the" is really spelled "teh".
Wow! I'm going to rush right over to Lulu and save $950!
2011 is going to be your year.
Did you know Lulu authors who use Lulu professional services sell twice as many books? It's true!
If it's been awhile since you looked into our publishing pack options, you're in for a pleasant surprise. Our professional services team is pleased to announce simplified solutions, which will save you even more time and money.
From now until January 24, enter code SVCNEWYEAR305 to save 20% off any Publishing Pack. Save up to $950.
Let me tell you a story, a true one. I stumbled upon a guy, I'll name names--Tony Harold I think it was--who was going to set up a publishing company here in America. We exchanged some emails and I sent him a novel. He liked it. He wanted to publish it. I told my friend who lived far far away. Simon (not his real name) sent Tony his novel. This novel was really quite good, very funny and deserved to be published but of course tradpub wasn't interested. Tony liked Simon's book. That was good. Simon flew in from far far away, and Tony flew in from far far away, and I came in quite a way and we all met. Tony had promised to give me an advance that day but he started backpedaling. He was spinning and lying in a way I had never quite seen before, and I had seen a lot of bad behavior. I got up and walked out. Say an hour later Simon got out of the meeting and we met for lunch. He signed with Tony. I couldn't believe what I was hearing. Simon had just witnessed me being abused by Tony and STILL he was comfortable signing with this guy. I tried to talk him out of it. But I suspect Simon thought it was mostly my fault, I can be difficult to get along with and maybe got offended that Tony wanted a rewrite. Okey Dokey. Fast forward like 2 years. Simon's book was published. I received a copy, it was fine physically, but everything else was wrong wrong wrong. Big lawsuit later...You know it was all sorrow. I don't even think Simon writes anymore and that's a tragedy. It's our loss.
"Simon" if you read this, fly to where your power is! Write comedy! EPUB!!!
That's how I feel about Lulu claiming anything about writers selling twice as much with their package. What, someone sells 2 instead of 1? Don't believe it. This publishing thing the way it is now should cost you ZERO. Learn how to do everything yourself, all knowledge is power. Don't pay anyone to do what you can do. The age of writers being desperate is over. That's so 20th Century.
Are you going to tell me that Lulu presents you with a paper book? Test market it first as an ebook. If people are clamoring for a paper book, then go with Lulu or CreateSpace.
Cover art can often be problematic. If you're already a good artist, you are golden. Most of us aren't that fortunate. I started my freshman year in college thinking I would be an art major and within a week I was a photography major. But I don't know how often a photo is really useful as artwork. Altho I don't see me changing the cover of Bad Apple anytime soon (ever) and I did that photo.
I've been struggling with Sweeps for...from the beginning. I still don't think that's the right title for it but I never come up with something better. Since it's been selling a little bit at Amazon this month, I'll stick with Sweeps. But the cover doesn't really do it justice. I considered hiring a designer but I never got a clear sense of what he intended for the quite substantial amount of money he wanted. Then I learned that HP Mallory bought the cover art and used Photoshop to tinker it together. I decided to search the stock image sites again, this time looking for vector art instead of photography. I found her image so I knew I was on the right track. I found an image I thought I could work with.
There were a couple issues with this image I liked well enough. Since it was intended for Valentine's Day, it was loaded with hearts. That didn't help me. If I wanted to stay with Sweeps and the soap opera inflection, I needed to get rid of the hearts, the box of candy and find a free broom. I would like to change the skin tone but every time I changed it, everything else also got dulled down/a pink cast over it. Someday I'll go back and try to figure that out but I have too much to do to be hung up on something that won't bother anyone else.
Yes, it would have been nice to have a guy in the image, too. I couldn't find that. I don't think I can learn how to do vector art, nor am I artistically inclined enough to come up with the right ideas. So you make do.
England does tend to express ideas we don't in the former colonies. Remember quite a few months back there was some whacked out editor for a women's magazine who found it creepy to breast feed?
Now we have Virginia Ironside speaking up on sexuality. I wouldn't be fair to you if I didn't point out that she also said this "If I were the mother of a suffering child – I mean a deeply suffering child – I would be the first to want to put a pillow over its face . . . If it was a child I really loved, who was in agony, I think any good mother would." a couple months ago. Read about it here: The Gruniad
The ease with which she assumes "any good mother would" is shocking. And I'd say no. Good and mothers who kill are words that don't belong in the same sentence.
This is a strange concept to me. I don't believe in killing people for convenience sake. Life is precious. You're supposed to prolong life, not take it.
So when Ginny's latest stunner came over the intertubes today, I was reluctant to even look but I skimmed. Here's the link
I'll give you 2 pull quotes from this "reflective" "thought piece"
To be honest, I mainly remember the 60s as an endless round of miserable promiscuity, a time when often it seemed easier and, believe it or not, more polite, to sleep with a man than to chuck him out of your flat. I recall a complete stranger once slipping into bed beside me when I was staying in an all-male household in Oxford, and feeling so baffled about what the right thing was to do that I let him have sex with me; I remember being got drunk by a grossly fat tabloid newspaper journalist and taken back to a flat belonging to a friend of his to which he had a key, being subjected to what would now be described as rape, and still thinking it was my fault for accepting so much wine. I remember going out to dinner with a young lawyer who inveigled me back to his flat saying he’d got to pick something up before he could take me home, and then suggested we have sex. ‘Oh no,’ I said feebly. ‘I’m too tired.’ ‘Oh, go on,’ he replied. ‘It’ll only take a couple of minutes.’ So I did.
and
The other reason that sex was so grim was that now it was so easy, the art of seduction had flown out of the window. I’m sure this was partly why working-class men became so much more attractive to everyone in the 60s. They’d always found, with less birth control available among the working classes and expensive abortion
not an option, that in order to get a girl into bed they had to work really hard at the
chat-up lines. But as for men considering women’s feelings – why should they?
They continued to satisfy their own needs and never for a moment considered whether the women they were having sex with found it pleasurable or satisfying. Most of us girls, at least those on the London rock scene as I was, didn’t have a clue as to what sex could be like when it was good. When we weren’t crying, we’d giggle, like the schoolgirls we were, about our exploits, without realising how damaging our sexual behaviour was both to our self-esteem and our souls.
Really? Wow. Who da thought?Discuss amongst yourselves.
"That's a laugh." That's a quote from a New Yorker cartoon. Two of Robin Hood's merry men are sitting under a tree and one says to the other "Maid Marion. That's a laugh."
That's funny, isn't it. Until you think about the insult to Marion. They wouldn't say "Robin Hood is a virgin, good on him." It's unimaginable. Robin would have to be a great swordsman. Speaking of which, I'll bet you didn't know Basil Rathbone actually was an excellent swordsman and did his own stunts in the movies. Sorry I couldn't embed the only clip from Robin Hood there was but Zorro's always good.
I was trying to think of good advice to give us. There's an explosion of success being recorded at Konrath's blog and I'm stumbling trying to not so much make sense of it as trying to fit myself into it.
If you can follow the direction of the money/sales, go for it. As Konrath put it. it's like the Gold Rush. Or the land rush. There's so much excitement for certain genres, almost anything can do really well as long as you come close. There is no scorn for commercial fiction, only praise. People love it and they're entertained.
I've never been very good at that and time hasn't changed that sad fact. I would love to be able to pay off my credit card debt in one month because I wrote a cool paranormal romance. (I don't even know what constitutes one.) If you can't and need to tell the stories in you, then try to be accurate in all aspects. Michaelangelo's statue of David is more interesting than a block of marble. Why? Because it's accurate. It was carved with exquisite attention to detail. Sculptors (it is always said) remove everything that doesn't look like the statue they have in mind. That's good advice. Remove everything that doesn't look like your story.
"A designer knows he has achieved perfection not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away." -- Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Or "You're really a good listener," so said John Valenti (Hi, John.)
The truth is I'm both. I'm very nosy but I apologize. Like today at WalMart, the cashier was talking to the customer behind me and I couldn't avoid hearing so I listened. Tanya (not her real name!) looked young, but tired, and said she had a child grown and on her own already. I thought she was 26 tops. But she was in her thirties and proceeded to start on her life story. I interrupted and said "I'm sorry if I'm being too nosy and don't tell me if you don't want to. Where's the father in all this?"
Tanya apparently wanted to tell her story. People just want to be heard. If you're listening to them, they're visible. I think that's what "good listener" means.
My rabbi is a very unique person. In Chassidic teachings, the importance of focusing your attention on what you're doing is stated time after time. Listen to the people, honor their life by paying attention to them. When you're reading, read for meaning, pay attention If you're writing, pay attention to what you're doing. Life shouldn't be slap dash, trying to get through this part so you can get to the next part faster. This part is important or you wouldn't be here.
So poor Tanya had a tough life but picked herself up, got on track and is managing quite well. I hope my interest in her story made her feel better this morning and I hope she knows she made an impression on me.
First off, I feel like I've talked entirely too much about myself lately so now I'm going to talk about my writing. Just kidding. But I am going to talk about writing.
Last year (not that long ago, is it) I read something by a nonfiction writer. It was obvious she could write but for me she was struggling with how to tell a story, an exercise that was totally alien to her. What did I tell her? I named a couple screenwriting books and told her to go study them. Which got her hackles up to some degree. And she asked someone who seemed bigger and smarter than me and that person told her to go read some books about screenwriting.
Why is this good advice? Because a script has to tell the complete story in under 120 pages. Every scene has to matter, impart vital information and keep the audience watching. A screenplay has a very definite structure. There are 3 acts and each one performs an important function.
Well, who cares? Novels aren't screenplays. No but they do have a structure. The reason why this structure works is that it works. Whether it's because people expect it or if it works because of the way the universe is organized doesn't matter. The 3 Act structure has been around since the days of the ancient Greek playwrights. If it didn't work it would have been abandoned long ago--people are not that stupid. (Don't ask me to prove it.)
All bets and all rules are not off just because we went digital. Good writing, wonderful writing, ...oh skip it, this is obviously not the goal of most people attempting to write.
I read something recently that came well recommended and it was like fanfic. There were vast passages--and I mean hundred of pages--that could have easily been ditched. Why? Because they didn't tell us anything. We didn't learn more about the character of the characters and since character is revealed through action and there was no action, there was nothing much going on. It was like one long Twitter experience. "Wow! I just brushed my teeth and used a different flavor toothpaste!" "I just got in the car and am going to work!" "BummerCity! I'm stuck at a railroad crossing and the train is sooooo long!"
This is not efficient storytelling. It's like a webcam aimed at someone's living room. (You thought I was going to say bedroom but then there would have been at least a vague hope of something happening)
I started reading a book that spent a couple pages on a woman shaving her legs. I thought "Gee, this is strange." Is the word du jour random? It's random if you have all the words in the dictionary in a hopper, you spin it and pick one out. Then it's random. It was also useless and boring. I don't want to see a woman shaving her legs or a character going to the bathroom either. Sorry. There are a number of things I don't want to see and those are two of them.
What I'm saying is that it's good to make sure what you're writing is interesting to someone other that just you. And even if for some random reason other people like this Twitter style of writing, you can entertain the notion of being more precise in what you're trying to convey in your book. Think about the construction of your story.
Does everything belong on the page/screen? Does everything add to our understanding of the story, situation and characters? Has what you're saying been said before in the story just in a slightly different manner? If the scenes are similar, do they each tell us something we didn't know before?
If you don't care about any of this, I wish I could think of something clever to say but all that comes to me is that I have no idea why you're writing. So if you are one of those people, post a comment and explain it. Help us understand--even if it's not in your writing style ;-)
Good Chinese food is a long drive from here. Japanese is a shorter drive but not close either. I made delicious dumplings for dinner and recommend Andrea Nguyen's book Asian Dumplings. It's an excellent cookbook on many levels. It has a good. encouraging tone, there are sufficient illustrations, mouth-watering (no, really) photos, and the recipes are simple No one should be reluctant to try dumplings at home if they have this book. She has a website too with some vids to help you out. Hint: you don't need ground pork, use Perdue ground chicken instead. With all the other flavors, you won't tell the difference.
Okay. Avalon. I got an email from the head honcho of the Avalon writers blog. She seemed very nice and welcomed me into the fold since my book is being published in less than a month. Gee, maybe the editor could have mentioned it to me since she mentioned it to them. But that's fine. Let's just get it over with.
The strange part is that these women have banded together to have a nice blog, and it is a nice blog, done by nice ladies (that'll give you a clue why I don't belong there since I guess I've had words with the last 3 editors on my book). She said this is good publicity.
Screech! Okay, back up this truck. Beep! Beep! Beep!
Avalon prints enough copies to cover the advance and they're like Vinny Gambini "I'm done wid this one." There is no you get royalties from Avalon. Am I revealing a secret? I don't know. But that's what one of their writers told me a year ago. I sure didn't hear it from anyone in the company before I signed the contract because if I had Love In The Air would be a Nook already. Thank God (really, not just a phrase to say) I got Disconnected/Paige Turning/Nothing Serious back from them. I suppose that is very clever business on their part when so many companies pulp their books and writers don't earn back their advances. So bravo to them.
But hang on, I thought, if I get interviewed by them as they wish, I get to mention my other books. That's publicity that counts. So I'll give you the link when it happens.
I spent about 5 hours today with the Dream Horse html file to try to determine what went wrong. I still don't see a reason why the spaces between some words are missing. The only thing I can figure is that it's a symptom of another issue.
I used Dream Weaver for a while. What a horrible experience. It's just too complicated. It's too Adobe. I tried a number of other similar programs and was lost with all of them. Then my last resort was trying Expression Web, a Microsoft program. I resist MS whenever possible. I seriously doubt if they had anything to do with the creation of this program--it's too good, too logical, too simple. It works. I recommend this for other people who know very little about html or css. You'll get a lot of help with this program.
Apparently, also something not announced upfront, Amazon would really prefer it if you submitted books in html.
Okay. What I was saying yesterday to my pal (my go-to guy for all questions computer) it's not like ebooks were invented last year. They've been around for awhile. Why is there no word processing program--Word, Open Office, that saves in epub or mobi. What, is everyone too busy creating apps for phones or whatever?
The whole process of turning a document into an acceptable ebook is ridiculous. So from the ridiculous to the sublime....
Here is the only clip I could find of When My Dreams Come True from the Marx Brothers movie, The Cocoanuts released in 1929, filmed at the Astoria Studio in Astoria, Queens, NY. Things don't come with a better pedigree than this. Earlier it had been a stage play on Broadway for a couple years written by the great George Kaufman, adapted for the film by the great Morrie Ryskind, starring the great Marx Brothers with music by the really super great Irving Berlin. This is where the famous routine Why A Duck comes from. Sure the technology of sound is new here and it's looks like a filmed stage play but it's still wonderful.
First, because the formatting won't let me put it at the end, I have come to a conclusion about vampires. I've been thinking about this whole issue (not the vampire part that's a big yawn but what's behind it) for years, unfortunately the discussion doesn't perhaps belong on this blog. Amanda Hocking nailed the situation as well as could be, that probably accounts for her enormous success with her series. She tapped into exactly what concerns people. As written, it explains everything. I'm not sure how obvious that is to most people reading the books but still it's there.
I will still say I'm curious about the transformation from---no I'm not, sorry, I do understand it. Not to leave you completely hanging--there is a clue that exists in the arc of how vampires were originally portrayed to the way they're portrayed now. This is the key to opening the door to figuring out this "phenomenon".
The first time I saw the explanation for this general question was in Umberto Eco's Foucault's Pendulum. As with everything he writes, this is a very dense book, layer built upon layer. And it's a wonderful adventure tale. But again, maybe Umberto and I just make life too complicated.
On to temporal successes. These things change by the hour and it would be better if it was in kiddie lit per se the way Summer Horse was at BN, but still this is very nice and again, what's selling sells.
There's been a terrible act of violence in Tucson as I write this we don't know exactly what so I'll refrain from commenting but it's obvious that the lives of some will never be the same. That's tragic and losses are painful, the reasons haunting and mysterious.
I have had no sales at BN for 2 days. Sales are quite nice at Amazon where they stunk on ice last month. Suddenly, out of nowhere, for no reason or activity of mine, Not Low Maintenance is selling well. Books that are selling sell. They get on the list--NLM is #87 or something, I guess that's enough to be seen--so they sell.
I didn't mention this but I did hear from the support team at BN and no, there is no problem with Just Kate, it downloads just fine so the two customers who decided to leave poor reviews on the book without reading it are just incompetent somehow. Those reviews will eventually be removed. Although it was supposed to be 8 hours and it's 24 and they're still there, I guess it'll happen eventually.
I suppose this blog is different than others in that I try to reflect on things in a writerly way so others may reflect as well. I can't give you a good reason why thinking more fully is better. Other people achieve great success with no thinking whatsoever. It's a more interesting way to live. Maybe there are no other layers. Maybe everything is just as it seems on the surface. Maybe that's why people are so bored and discontented with their lives.
Maybe people have stopped asking "why?" If they have, that's sad.
After spending 5 hours trying to reformat Burning Daylight to suit Amazon. I decided, heck, treat city. I will talk to you about the pizza but I'm sure you are so hanging on my every word about the formatting.
I have no idea what went wrong. I stripped the formatting a numbers of times--hence the 5 hours. I was looking at the non printing characters. It looked fine in Word DOC (not docX) and yet when I uploaded it, the emulator always had no indents. The simplest thing for me to do was to comb back thru it a final time after accepting there would be no indents, I could at least add a space between the paragraphs. More Smashwordsish than normal Kindle but I can't solve it better than that today. Sometime when I'm hankering for a project, I'll try again.
Pizza. This is so easy but you do have to be somewhat prepared. Actually it's going to sound so difficult....
The dough is terrific and can be used for pizza or bread or rolls. You can make bialys out of it. This is from Richard Bertinet and he's a very nice man so I recommend highly his books Dough and Crust both of which I have and loved and wrote him to tell him so and he wrote back.
You really need a scale. Or try to do some math but weighing is always better in the kitchen--sorry about that.
I cut this in 1/2 but you do what you need to do.
18 oz bread flour
11 oz warm water
2 teaspoons yeast
2 teaspoons salt
You can add 2 oz of semolina flour which gives it a nice nutty taste but if you don't have that, no problem. Just remember you're aiming at 18 oz. Not 20. Throw that into your mixer which is heresy because Richard wants you to do this by hand but come on, I don't have the time and I hate the mess. It's a sticky dough. Refrain from adding more flour. Seriously. Let it mix away until the flour absorbs the liquid. It will. No there is no sugar and no oil in the recipe. Don't think I'm making a mistake. Mix mix mix until it's smooth and not so sticky. Put in a floured bowl--I know he goes against everything you ever did with bread, but trust me this will convert you. Let rise until doubled OR here comes some more heresy. Use the microwave as a proofing box. Put the dough in a heat proof glass bowl, cover with a towel, insert a cup measure full of water into the microwave. Heat on low for 40 seconds. Don't open the door for 7 min. Turn bowl. Heat on low again for 40 seconds. Wait 7 minutes. Okay, you just sped-proofed the dough. Note: If you were really making bread, you'd want to remove the dough, shape it, put it in baking pans or whatever and go thru a 2nd rise. But pizza dough isn't bread.
Take some dough, (not all of it, be sensible!) spread it out thin, best on some parchment paper if you don't have a baking stone. Top with your choice of toppings. Bake at the highest temp your oven will get to until done. Should be 10-14 min.
